E-Signature Software · reliability comparison
Adobe Acrobat Sign vs BoldSign: which is more reliable? (2026)
BoldSign is more reliable than Adobe Acrobat Sign, scoring 100.0 vs 51.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Adobe Acrobat Sign reported 17 incidents and BoldSign reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.23% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 3, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Adobe Acrobat Sign | BoldSign |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 51.0 | 100.0 |
| Rank (e-signature tools) | #10 | #3 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.23% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 17 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 2 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 4h | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | Collecting data | Collecting data |
Where Adobe Acrobat Sign and BoldSign differ
- BoldSign reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Adobe Acrobat Sign reported 17.
- Adobe Acrobat Sign had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for BoldSign.
90-day uptime
Adobe Acrobat Sign
BoldSign
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Adobe Acrobat Sign incidents
- Degraded performanceNov 3, 2026 · ongoing
- Degraded performanceNov 1, 2026 · resolved in 28m
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved in 12m
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved in 3h 24m
- Degraded performanceOct 25, 2026 · resolved in 1m
Recent BoldSign incidents
No incidents reported by BoldSign in the last 90 days.