Authentication Providers · reliability comparison
Auth0 vs Stytch: which is more reliable? (2026)
Stytch is more reliable than Auth0, scoring 84.8 vs 33.9 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Auth0 reported 6 incidents and Stytch reported 6, with effective uptime of 92.49% and 99.82% respectively. Stytch resolves incidents faster on average (2h 5m).
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Auth0 | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 33.9 | 84.8 |
| Rank (authentication providers) | #8 | #4 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 92.49% | 99.82% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 6 | 6 |
| Partial / major outages | 3 | 1 |
| Avg time to resolve | 2d 12h | 2h 5m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Auth0 and Stytch differ
- Auth0 had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 1 for Stytch.
- Stytch fixes problems faster: 2h 5m on average, against 2d 12h for Auth0 (28.8× quicker).
- Auth0's longest outage on record lasted 3d (Oct 23, 2026); Stytch's lasted 16h 46m (Jun 15, 2026).
90-day uptime
Auth0
Stytch
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Auth0 incidents
- MaintenanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- MaintenanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved in <1m
- Partial outageOct 23, 2026 · resolved in 356d 18h
Elevated Errors on Multiple Public Cloud Environmentsofficial update ↗
- Partial outageOct 23, 2026 · resolved in <1m
- Degraded performanceSep 15, 2026 · resolved in 311d 13h
- Degraded performanceSep 3, 2026 · resolved in 362d 21h
Recent Stytch incidents
- MaintenanceNov 8, 2026 · ongoing
- Degraded performanceOct 22, 2026 · resolved in 2h 29m
- Degraded performanceOct 6, 2026 · resolved in 59m
- MaintenanceSep 10, 2026 · resolved in 30m
- Degraded performanceSep 9, 2026 · resolved in 2h 16m
- Degraded performanceSep 1, 2026 · resolved in 57m
Other authentication providers to consider
- Ory Network · #1 · 99.99% uptime
- Kinde · #2 · 99.96% uptime
- Frontegg · #3 · 99.97% uptime
- WorkOS · #5 · 99.30% uptime
See the full most reliable authentication providers ranking →