Social Media Management Tools · reliability comparison
Buffer vs CoSchedule: which is more reliable? (2026)
CoSchedule is more reliable than Buffer, scoring 100.0 vs 58.8 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Buffer reported 21 incidents and CoSchedule reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.23% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Buffer | CoSchedule |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 58.8 | 100.0 |
| Rank (social media management tools) | #7 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.23% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 21 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 8 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 3h 36m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Buffer and CoSchedule differ
- CoSchedule reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Buffer reported 21.
- Buffer had 8 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for CoSchedule.
90-day uptime
Buffer
CoSchedule
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Buffer incidents
- Partial outageOct 22, 2026 · resolved in 12m
Affected: Publishing
- InformationalOct 9, 2026 · resolved in 3h 24m
- Degraded performanceOct 8, 2026 · resolved in 1d 3h
Issue Connecting & Refreshing YouTube
Affected: Youtube, Channel connections
- InformationalOct 5, 2026 · resolved in 2m
- Partial outageOct 1, 2026 · resolved in 2h 26m
Issue with publishing to Mastodon accounts hosted on mastodon.social and mastodon.onlineofficial update ↗
Affected: Publishing, Channel connections, Mastodon
- Partial outageSep 25, 2026 · resolved in 1h 20m
Issues with Buffer fully loading
Affected: Settings, Community, Analytics, Channel connections
Recent CoSchedule incidents
No incidents reported by CoSchedule in the last 90 days.
Other social media management tools to consider
- Planable · #1 · 99.98% uptime
- Later · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- SocialBee · #3 · 100% uptime
- Vista Social · #4 · 99.86% uptime
See the full most reliable social media management tools ranking →