Email Marketing Platforms · reliability comparison
Campaign Monitor vs Drip: which is more reliable? (2026)
Drip is more reliable than Campaign Monitor, scoring 100.0 vs 59.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Campaign Monitor reported 1 incident and Drip reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.50% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Campaign Monitor | Drip |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 59.2 | 100.0 |
| Rank (email marketing platforms) | #12 | #1 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.50% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 3d | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Campaign Monitor and Drip differ
- Drip reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Campaign Monitor reported 1.
- Campaign Monitor's longest outage on record lasted 1h 9m (Jul 16, 2026); Drip's lasted 1d 16h (Apr 20, 2026).
90-day uptime
Campaign Monitor
Drip
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Campaign Monitor incidents
- Degraded performanceSep 4, 2026 · resolved in 17d 1h
- MaintenanceAug 9, 2026 · resolved in 1h 10m
Recent Drip incidents
No incidents reported by Drip in the last 90 days.
Other email marketing platforms to consider
- MailerLite · #2 · 100% uptime
- Omnisend · #3 · 100% uptime
- AWeber · #4 · 100% uptime
- HubSpot Marketing Hub · #5 · 100% uptime
See the full most reliable email marketing platforms ranking →