SMS & Voice APIs · reliability comparison
ClickSend vs Textmagic: which is more reliable? (2026)
ClickSend is more reliable than Textmagic, scoring 100.0 vs 86.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days ClickSend reported 0 incidents and Textmagic reported 1, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.82% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | ClickSend | Textmagic |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 86.2 |
| Rank (SMS & voice APIs) | — | #3 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.82% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 1 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 1 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 3h 44m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where ClickSend and Textmagic differ
- ClickSend reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Textmagic reported 1.
- Textmagic had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for ClickSend.
- ClickSend's longest outage on record lasted 22h 49m (Dec 8, 2025); Textmagic's lasted 3h 44m (Aug 20, 2026).
90-day uptime
ClickSend
Textmagic
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent ClickSend incidents
No incidents reported by ClickSend in the last 90 days.
Recent Textmagic incidents
- Major outageAug 20, 2026 · resolved in 3h 44m
Service disruption due to server provider issuesofficial update ↗
Affected: Web App, Sending text messages (Outbound SMS), Receiving text messages (Inbound SMS), Email campaigns, Email to SMS, SMS API Gateway +3 more
Other SMS & voice APIs to consider
- Plivo · #1 · 100% uptime
- Telesign · #2 · 99.91% uptime
- Africa's Talking · #4 · 99.80% uptime
- Infobip · #5 · 99.73% uptime