Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Codeberg vs SourceHut: which is more reliable? (2026)
SourceHut is more reliable than Codeberg, scoring 100.0 vs 90.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Codeberg reported 0 incidents and SourceHut reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Codeberg | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 90.0 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 50/100 | 100/100 |
90-day uptime
Codeberg
SourceHut
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Codeberg incidents
No incidents reported by Codeberg in the last 90 days.
Recent SourceHut incidents
- MaintenanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →