Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Codeberg vs Travis CI: which is more reliable? (2026)
Travis CI is more reliable than Codeberg, scoring 100.0 vs 90.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Codeberg reported 0 incidents and Travis CI reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Codeberg | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 90.0 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 50/100 | 100/100 |
90-day uptime
Codeberg
Travis CI
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Codeberg incidents
No incidents reported by Codeberg in the last 90 days.
Recent Travis CI incidents
No incidents reported by Travis CI in the last 90 days.
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →