Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Codemagic vs GitLab: which is more reliable? (2026)
Codemagic is more reliable than GitLab, scoring 100.0 vs 81.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Codemagic reported 0 incidents and GitLab reported 10, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Codemagic | GitLab |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 81.2 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | — | #3 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 10 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 4 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Codemagic and GitLab differ
- Codemagic reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while GitLab reported 10.
- GitLab had 4 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Codemagic.
90-day uptime
Codemagic
GitLab
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Codemagic incidents
No incidents reported by Codemagic in the last 90 days.
Recent GitLab incidents
- Major outageOct 31, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 23, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Partial outageOct 20, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Partial outageOct 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
- Buildkite · #5 · 99.57% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →