Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Codemagic vs Travis CI: which is more reliable? (2026)
Codemagic and Travis CI are effectively tied on reliability (100.0 vs 100.0). Over the last 90 days Codemagic reported 0 incidents and Travis CI reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Codemagic | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
90-day uptime
Codemagic
Travis CI
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Codemagic incidents
No incidents reported by Codemagic in the last 90 days.
Recent Travis CI incidents
No incidents reported by Travis CI in the last 90 days.
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →