Social Media Management Tools · reliability comparison
CoSchedule vs Publer: which is more reliable? (2026)
CoSchedule is more reliable than Publer, scoring 100.0 vs 90.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days CoSchedule reported 0 incidents and Publer reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | CoSchedule | Publer |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 90.0 |
| Rank (social media management tools) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 50/100 |
90-day uptime
CoSchedule
Publer
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent CoSchedule incidents
No incidents reported by CoSchedule in the last 90 days.
Recent Publer incidents
No incidents reported by Publer in the last 90 days.
Other social media management tools to consider
- Planable · #1 · 99.98% uptime
- Later · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- SocialBee · #3 · 100% uptime
- Vista Social · #4 · 99.86% uptime
See the full most reliable social media management tools ranking →