Restaurant Reservation Systems · reliability comparison
CoverManager vs TableCheck: which is more reliable? (2026)
TableCheck is more reliable than CoverManager, scoring 100.0 vs 68.3 out of 100. Over the last 90 days CoverManager reported 3 incidents and TableCheck reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.35% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | CoverManager | TableCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 68.3 | 100.0 |
| Rank (restaurant reservation systems) | #5 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.35% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 3 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 2 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 4h 40m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where CoverManager and TableCheck differ
- TableCheck reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while CoverManager reported 3.
- CoverManager had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for TableCheck.
90-day uptime
CoverManager
TableCheck
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent CoverManager incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in <1m
- Major outageOct 28, 2026 · resolved in 14h
- Major outageOct 28, 2026 · resolved in <1m
Recent TableCheck incidents
No incidents reported by TableCheck in the last 90 days.
Other restaurant reservation systems to consider
- Eat App · #1 · 100% uptime
- ResDiary · #2 · 99.88% uptime
- Zenchef · #3 · 100% uptime
- SevenRooms · #4 · 99.76% uptime
See the full most reliable restaurant reservation systems ranking →