Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Depot vs SourceHut: which is more reliable? (2026)
SourceHut is more reliable than Depot, scoring 100.0 vs 85.5 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Depot reported 9 incidents and SourceHut reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.89% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Depot | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 85.5 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | #2 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.89% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 9 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 4 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 1h 6m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Depot and SourceHut differ
- SourceHut reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Depot reported 9.
- Depot had 4 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for SourceHut.
90-day uptime
Depot
SourceHut
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Depot incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 3h 2m
Affected: us-east-1, Depot CI
- Partial outageOct 8, 2026 · resolved in 1h 55m
Affected: us-east-1, Depot CI
- Degraded performanceOct 6, 2026 · resolved in 1h 41m
Slow disk I/O for US container builds
Affected: us-east-1
- Degraded performanceOct 5, 2026 · resolved in 1h 48m
Slow disk I/O for EU container builds
Affected: eu-central-1
- Degraded performanceSep 28, 2026 · resolved in 19m
Elevated queue times for Sandboxes and Depot CI Jobs
Affected: Depot CI
- Partial outageSep 20, 2026 · resolved in 6m
Affected: us-east-1, Depot CI
Recent SourceHut incidents
- MaintenanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
- Azure DevOps · #5 · 98.62% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →