Authentication Providers · reliability comparison
Descope vs Frontegg: which is more reliable? (2026)
Descope is more reliable than Frontegg, scoring 100.0 vs 94.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Descope reported 0 incidents and Frontegg reported 5, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.97% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Descope | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 94.0 |
| Rank (authentication providers) | — | #3 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.97% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 5 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 45m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Descope and Frontegg differ
- Descope reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Frontegg reported 5.
- Descope's longest incident on record lasted 2h 32m (Nov 18, 2025); Frontegg's lasted 5h 36m (Jul 16, 2026).
90-day uptime
Descope
Frontegg
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Descope incidents
- MaintenanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 2h
- MaintenanceOct 28, 2026 · resolved in 2h
- MaintenanceOct 25, 2026 · resolved in 30m
- MaintenanceOct 25, 2026 · resolved in 30m
- MaintenanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved in 2h
- MaintenanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 1h
Recent Frontegg incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 38m
Affected: Authentication APIs
- Degraded performanceOct 11, 2026 · resolved in 44m
Affected: Management Portal
- Degraded performanceOct 6, 2026 · resolved in 34m
Affected: Authentication APIs, Management APIs, Management Portal
- Degraded performanceOct 4, 2026 · resolved in 21m
Affected: Authentication APIs, Management APIs, Management Portal
- Degraded performanceAug 20, 2026 · resolved in 1h 28m
Degraded Performance - EU region
Affected: Authentication APIs
Other authentication providers to consider
- Ory Network · #1 · 99.99% uptime
- Kinde · #2 · 99.96% uptime
- Stytch · #4 · 99.82% uptime
- WorkOS · #5 · 99.30% uptime
See the full most reliable authentication providers ranking →