Web Hosting · reliability comparison
Flywheel vs SiteGround: which is more reliable? (2026)
Flywheel is more reliable than SiteGround, scoring 88.4 vs 80.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Flywheel reported 2 incidents and SiteGround reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Flywheel | SiteGround |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 88.4 | 80.0 |
| Rank (web hosts) | #2 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 2 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 0/100 |
Where Flywheel and SiteGround differ
- SiteGround reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Flywheel reported 2.
90-day uptime
Flywheel
SiteGround
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Flywheel incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceAug 18, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent SiteGround incidents
No incidents reported by SiteGround in the last 90 days.
Other web hosts to consider
- Namecheap Hosting · #1 · 100% uptime
- Pressable · #3 · 100% uptime
- DreamHost · #4 · 100% uptime
- GoDaddy Web Hosting · #5 · 99.49% uptime