Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
GitHub vs Travis CI: which is more reliable? (2026)
Travis CI is more reliable than GitHub, scoring 100.0 vs 47.1 out of 100. Over the last 90 days GitHub reported 35 incidents and Travis CI reported 0, with effective uptime of 98.37% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | GitHub | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 47.1 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | #10 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 98.37% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 35 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 11 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 2h 33m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where GitHub and Travis CI differ
- Travis CI reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while GitHub reported 35.
- GitHub had 11 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Travis CI.
- GitHub's longest outage on record lasted 4h 30m (Oct 21, 2026); Travis CI's lasted 5h 14m (May 25, 2026).
90-day uptime
GitHub
Travis CI
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent GitHub incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 30, 2026 · resolved in 2h 30m
- Partial outageOct 30, 2026 · resolved in 1h 33m
Incident with Actions, Pages, and Webhooks
Affected: Webhooks, Actions, Pages
- Major outageOct 30, 2026 · resolved in 32m
Disruption with GitHub servicesofficial update ↗
Affected: Issues, Pages
- InformationalOct 27, 2026 · resolved in <1m
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved in 9m
Incident with Actions, Issues, API Requests and Pull Requests
Affected: API Requests, Issues, Pull Requests, Actions
- Degraded performanceOct 23, 2026 · resolved in 3h 53m
Recent Travis CI incidents
No incidents reported by Travis CI in the last 90 days.
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →