Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
GitLab vs SourceHut: which is more reliable? (2026)
SourceHut is more reliable than GitLab, scoring 100.0 vs 81.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days GitLab reported 10 incidents and SourceHut reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | GitLab | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 81.2 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | #3 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 10 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 4 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where GitLab and SourceHut differ
- SourceHut reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while GitLab reported 10.
- GitLab had 4 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for SourceHut.
90-day uptime
GitLab
SourceHut
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent GitLab incidents
- Major outageOct 31, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 23, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Partial outageOct 20, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Partial outageOct 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent SourceHut incidents
- MaintenanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
- Buildkite · #5 · 99.57% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →