E-Signature Software · reliability comparison
Juro vs SignNow: which is more reliable? (2026)
Juro and SignNow are effectively tied on reliability (100.0 vs 98.9). Over the last 90 days Juro reported 0 incidents and SignNow reported 1, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.99% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Juro | SignNow |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 98.9 |
| Rank (e-signature tools) | #2 | #5 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.99% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 1 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 8m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Juro and SignNow differ
- Juro reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while SignNow reported 1.
- Juro's longest incident on record lasted 10h 12m (Mar 23, 2026); SignNow's lasted 5h 9m (Mar 11, 2026).
90-day uptime
Juro
SignNow
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Juro incidents
No incidents reported by Juro in the last 90 days.
Recent SignNow incidents
- Degraded performanceSep 4, 2026 · resolved in 8m
University SignNow Unavailable
Affected: Web
Other e-signature tools to consider
- BoldSign · #1 · 100% uptime
- Signeasy · #3 · 100% uptime
- SignWell · #4 · 100% uptime
- Dropbox Sign · #6 · 99.94% uptime