Authentication Providers · reliability comparison
Kinde vs Supabase Auth: which is more reliable? (2026)
Kinde is more reliable than Supabase Auth, scoring 94.3 vs 28.7 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Kinde reported 2 incidents and Supabase Auth reported 39, with effective uptime of 99.96% and 95.54% respectively. Kinde resolves incidents faster on average (45m).
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Kinde | Supabase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 94.3 | 28.7 |
| Rank (authentication providers) | #2 | #9 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.96% | 95.54% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 2 | 39 |
| Partial / major outages | 2 | 10 |
| Avg time to resolve | 45m | 15h 2m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Kinde and Supabase Auth differ
- Supabase Auth reported 19.5× as many incidents as Kinde over the last 90 days (39 vs 2).
- Supabase Auth had 10 partial or major outages, compared with 2 for Kinde.
- Kinde fixes problems faster: 45m on average, against 15h 2m for Supabase Auth (20.1× quicker).
- Kinde's longest outage on record lasted 1h 12m (Sep 23, 2026); Supabase Auth's lasted 1d 3h (Sep 10, 2026).
90-day uptime
Kinde
Supabase Auth
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Kinde incidents
- Partial outageSep 23, 2026 · resolved in 1h 12m
- Partial outageAug 25, 2026 · resolved in 18m
Recent Supabase Auth incidents
- InformationalOct 31, 2026 · resolved in 1h 8m
- InformationalOct 30, 2026 · resolved in 51m
- InformationalOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 7h 41m
- InformationalOct 10, 2026 · resolved in <1m
Intermittent connection errors via the connection pooler in us-east-1
- InformationalOct 6, 2026 · resolved in 2h 56m
- Degraded performanceOct 6, 2026 · resolved in 1h 10m
Increased errors on management api leading to project operation failures
Other authentication providers to consider
- Ory Network · #1 · 99.99% uptime
- Frontegg · #3 · 99.97% uptime
- Stytch · #4 · 99.82% uptime
- WorkOS · #5 · 99.30% uptime
See the full most reliable authentication providers ranking →