Video Conferencing · reliability comparison
Microsoft Teams vs RingCentral Video: which is more reliable? (2026)
Microsoft Teams is more reliable than RingCentral Video, scoring 100.0 vs 88.4 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Microsoft Teams reported 0 incidents and RingCentral Video reported 2, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Microsoft Teams | RingCentral Video |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 88.4 |
| Rank (video conferencing platforms) | — | #5 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 2 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Microsoft Teams and RingCentral Video differ
- Microsoft Teams reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while RingCentral Video reported 2.
90-day uptime
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral Video
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Microsoft Teams incidents
No incidents reported by Microsoft Teams in the last 90 days.
Recent RingCentral Video incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 8, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Affected: Video
- Degraded performanceSep 22, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Affected: Video
Other video conferencing platforms to consider
- Google Meet · #1 · 100% uptime
- Livestorm · #2 · 99.99% uptime
- Whereby · #3 · 99.95% uptime
- GoTo Meeting · #4 · 99.94% uptime
See the full most reliable video conferencing platforms ranking →