App Hosting Platforms · reliability comparison
Northflank vs Zeabur: which is more reliable? (2026)
Northflank is more reliable than Zeabur, scoring 71.8 vs 37.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Northflank reported 5 incidents and Zeabur reported 2, with effective uptime of 99.51% and 95.00% respectively. Northflank resolves incidents faster on average (2h 46m).
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Northflank | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 71.8 | 37.0 |
| Rank (app hosting platforms) | #7 | #11 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.51% | 95.00% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 5 | 2 |
| Partial / major outages | 1 | 2 |
| Avg time to resolve | 2h 46m | 3d |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Northflank and Zeabur differ
- Northflank reported 2.5× as many incidents as Zeabur over the last 90 days (5 vs 2).
- Zeabur had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 1 for Northflank.
- Northflank fixes problems faster: 2h 46m on average, against 3d for Zeabur (26.1× quicker).
- Northflank's longest outage on record lasted 1h 22m (Jul 22, 2026); Zeabur's lasted 3d (Oct 15, 2026).
90-day uptime
Northflank
Zeabur
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Northflank incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 30, 2026 · ongoing
- Degraded performanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 6h 51m
- Degraded performanceSep 25, 2026 · resolved in 46m
- Degraded performanceSep 4, 2026 · resolved in 2h 25m
- Partial outageAug 5, 2026 · resolved in 1h 1m
Recent Zeabur incidents
- Partial outageOct 15, 2026 · resolved in 4d 10h
Unauthorized Access to Zeabur Infrastructure and User Dataofficial update ↗
- Major outageAug 28, 2026 · resolved in 12d 15h
Unauthorized Access to Project Environment Variable Dataofficial update ↗
Other app hosting platforms to consider
- DigitalOcean App Platform · #1 · 99.98% uptime
- Heroku · #2 · 99.95% uptime
- Koyeb · #3 · 99.64% uptime
- Render · #4 · 99.71% uptime