Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Semaphore vs SourceHut: which is more reliable? (2026)
SourceHut is more reliable than Semaphore, scoring 100.0 vs 54.9 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Semaphore reported 22 incidents and SourceHut reported 0, with effective uptime of 98.92% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Semaphore | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 54.9 | 100.0 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | #10 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 98.92% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 22 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 6 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 4h 2m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Semaphore and SourceHut differ
- SourceHut reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Semaphore reported 22.
- Semaphore had 6 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for SourceHut.
90-day uptime
Semaphore
SourceHut
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Semaphore incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 1h 25m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved in 3h 14m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved in 2h 41m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 22, 2026 · resolved in 2h 15m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved in 3h 47m
Affected: Semaphore
- InformationalOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 2h 1m
Affected: Semaphore
Recent SourceHut incidents
- MaintenanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →