E-Signature Software · reliability comparison
Adobe Acrobat Sign vs PandaDoc: which is more reliable? (2026)
Adobe Acrobat Sign and PandaDoc are effectively tied on reliability (90.0 vs 89.0). Over the last 90 days Adobe Acrobat Sign reported 0 incidents and PandaDoc reported 3, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.88% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Adobe Acrobat Sign | PandaDoc |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 90.0 | 89.0 |
| Rank (e-signature tools) | — | #7 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.88% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 3 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 1 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 2h 33m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 50/100 | 100/100 |
Where Adobe Acrobat Sign and PandaDoc differ
- Adobe Acrobat Sign reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while PandaDoc reported 3.
- PandaDoc had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for Adobe Acrobat Sign.
90-day uptime
Adobe Acrobat Sign
PandaDoc
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Adobe Acrobat Sign incidents
No incidents reported by Adobe Acrobat Sign in the last 90 days.
Recent PandaDoc incidents
- InformationalSep 7, 2026 · resolved in 13h 26m
Affected: Creating and editing documents, Sending documents, Uploading documents, API, Downloading documents
- Degraded performanceSep 1, 2026 · resolved in 27m
Inline fields may not work in the recipient view
Affected: Public (recipient) view, Public (recipient) view
- Partial outageAug 20, 2026 · resolved in 4h 39m
Some users experience issues with creation and viewing of documentsofficial update ↗
Affected: Creating and editing documents, Sending documents, Uploading documents