Business Banking · reliability comparison

Bluevine vs Mercury: which is more reliable? (2026)

Bluevine is more reliable than Mercury, scoring 80.0 vs 56.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Bluevine reported 0 incidents and Mercury reported 5, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.23% respectively.

Data updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we score

Bluevine

80.0/100

No public status page

Visit Bluevine ↗

Mercury

56.6/100

Operational

Visit Mercury ↗
VS
MetricBluevineMercury
Reliability score80.056.6
Rank (business banking providers)—#4
Uptime (90 days)100%99.23%
Incidents (90 days)05
Partial / major outages00
Avg time to resolve—19h
Outages we detected00
Transparency score0/100100/100

Where Bluevine and Mercury differ

  • Bluevine reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Mercury reported 5.

90-day uptime

Bluevine

Aug 5, 2026 – Oct 31, 2026: no dataNov 1, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Mercury

Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026: no dataSep 1, 2026: 99.60% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 2, 2026: 98.69% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 3, 2026 – Oct 1, 2026: no incidentsOct 2, 2026: 99.18% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 3, 2026 – Oct 6, 2026: no incidentsOct 7, 2026: 98.89% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 8, 2026: 85.00% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 9, 2026: 85.00% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 10, 2026: 86.10% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 11, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.245% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Bluevine incidents

No incidents reported by Bluevine in the last 90 days.

Full Bluevine reliability report →

Recent Mercury incidents

Full Mercury reliability report →

Other business banking providers to consider

See the full most reliable business banking providers ranking →