Affiliate Networks · reliability comparison

ClickBank vs impact.com: which is more reliable? (2026)

ClickBank is more reliable than impact.com, scoring 97.3 vs 79.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days ClickBank reported 1 incident and impact.com reported 2, with effective uptime of 99.99% and 99.75% respectively. ClickBank resolves incidents faster on average (27m).

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

ClickBank

97.3/100

Operational

Visit ClickBank ↗

impact.com

79.6/100

Operational

Visit impact.com ↗
VS
MetricClickBankimpact.com
Reliability score97.379.6
Rank (affiliate networks)#3#5
Uptime (90 days)99.99%99.75%
Incidents (90 days)12
Partial / major outages11
Avg time to resolve27m6h 28m
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where ClickBank and impact.com differ

  • impact.com reported 2× as many incidents as ClickBank over the last 90 days (2 vs 1).
  • ClickBank fixes problems faster: 27m on average, against 6h 28m for impact.com (14.4× quicker).
  • ClickBank's longest outage on record lasted 1h 38m (Nov 18, 2025); impact.com's lasted 9h 26m (Aug 20, 2026).

90-day uptime

ClickBank

Aug 4, 2026 – Sep 20, 2026: no incidentsSep 21, 2026: 99.06% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Sep 22, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.989% average daily uptimeToday

impact.com

Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026: no incidentsAug 20, 2026: 80.33% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Aug 21, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026: no incidentsOct 21, 2026: 97.82% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 22, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.757% average daily uptimeToday

Recent ClickBank incidents

Full ClickBank reliability report →

Recent impact.com incidents

Full impact.com reliability report →

Other affiliate networks to consider

See the full most reliable affiliate networks ranking →