CDN & DNS Providers · reliability comparison
ClouDNS vs Imperva: which is more reliable? (2026)
ClouDNS is more reliable than Imperva, scoring 80.0 vs 31.9 out of 100. Over the last 90 days ClouDNS reported 0 incidents and Imperva reported 30, with effective uptime of 100% and 96.09% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | ClouDNS | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 80.0 | 31.9 |
| Rank (CDN & DNS providers) | — | #9 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 96.09% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 30 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 8 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 11h 57m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Where ClouDNS and Imperva differ
- ClouDNS reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Imperva reported 30.
- Imperva had 8 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for ClouDNS.
90-day uptime
ClouDNS
Imperva
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent ClouDNS incidents
No incidents reported by ClouDNS in the last 90 days.
Recent Imperva incidents
- Major outageOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 9h 5m
[INC-1173] - QRO PoP Connectivity Issueofficial update ↗
Affected: Queretaro, Mexico (QRO)
- Degraded performanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 7h 38m
[INC-1166] Service Degradation Affecting Newly Onboarded Sites
Affected: Cloud Security Management Platform
- InformationalOct 19, 2026 · resolved in 5h 10m
[INC-1165] Service Degradation Affecting Newly Onboarded Sites
- InformationalOct 13, 2026 · resolved in 2h 11m
- Degraded performanceOct 13, 2026 · resolved in 4h 16m
[INC-1160] Degradation of Imperva Generated Certificate Issuance
Affected: Cloud Security Management Platform
- Partial outageOct 9, 2026 · resolved in 11h 55m
[INC-1158] Service Degradation of Dallas, TX (DAL) PoPofficial update ↗
Affected: Dallas, TX (DAL)
Other CDN & DNS providers to consider
- DNSimple · #1 · 99.94% uptime
- Amazon CloudFront · #2 · 100% uptime
- Amazon Route 53 · #3 · 100% uptime
- Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS · #4 · 99.85% uptime