Expense Management Software · reliability comparison
Fyle vs SAP Concur: which is more reliable? (2026)
Fyle is more reliable than SAP Concur, scoring 100.0 vs 77.1 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Fyle reported 0 incidents and SAP Concur reported 1, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.74% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Fyle | SAP Concur |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 77.1 |
| Rank (expense management tools) | — | #4 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.74% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 1 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 6h 46m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Fyle and SAP Concur differ
- Fyle reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while SAP Concur reported 1.
90-day uptime
Fyle
SAP Concur
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Fyle incidents
No incidents reported by Fyle in the last 90 days.
Recent SAP Concur incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 6h 46m
Request degradation (Concur Cloud for Public Sector)
Affected: Request
Other expense management tools to consider
- Airbase · #1 · 100% uptime
- Rydoo · #2 · 100% uptime
- Navan · #3 · 99.97% uptime
- Emburse Professional · #5 · 99.61% uptime
See the full most reliable expense management software ranking →