Business Phone Systems · reliability comparison

Grasshopper vs net2phone: which is more reliable? (2026)

Grasshopper is more reliable than net2phone, scoring 94.6 vs 81.1 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Grasshopper reported 1 incident and net2phone reported 1, with effective uptime of 99.96% and 99.89% respectively. Grasshopper resolves incidents faster on average (1h 31m).

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

Grasshopper

94.6/100

Operational

Visit Grasshopper ↗

net2phone

81.1/100

Operational

Visit net2phone ↗
VS
MetricGrasshoppernet2phone
Reliability score94.681.1
Rank (business phone systems)#1#6
Uptime (90 days)99.96%99.89%
Incidents (90 days)11
Partial / major outages10
Avg time to resolve1h 31m14h 35m
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Grasshopper and net2phone differ

  • Grasshopper had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for net2phone.
  • Grasshopper fixes problems faster: 1h 31m on average, against 14h 35m for net2phone (9.6× quicker).
  • Grasshopper's longest outage on record lasted 23h 54m (Jan 22, 2026); net2phone's lasted 16m (Nov 21, 2025).

90-day uptime

Grasshopper

Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 14, 2026: no incidentsAug 15, 2026: 96.84% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Aug 16, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.964% average daily uptimeToday

net2phone

Aug 4, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026: no incidentsOct 21, 2026: 97.52% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 22, 2026: 93.35% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 23, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.898% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Grasshopper incidents

Full Grasshopper reliability report →

Recent net2phone incidents

Full net2phone reliability report →

Other business phone systems to consider

See the full most reliable business phone systems ranking →