Restaurant POS · reliability comparison
HungerRush vs Qu POS: which is more reliable? (2026)
Qu POS is more reliable than HungerRush, scoring 90.0 vs 78.9 out of 100. Over the last 90 days HungerRush reported 3 incidents and Qu POS reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.71% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | HungerRush | Qu POS |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 78.9 | 90.0 |
| Rank (restaurant POS systems) | #7 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.71% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 3 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 3 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 3h 36m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Where HungerRush and Qu POS differ
- Qu POS reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while HungerRush reported 3.
- HungerRush had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Qu POS.
90-day uptime
HungerRush
Qu POS
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent HungerRush incidents
- Major outageSep 18, 2026 · resolved in 1h 36m
WorldPay Outageofficial update ↗
Affected: WorldPay Express (heritage Revention), WorldPay Integrated Payments (heritage CRS), WorldPay Core
- Partial outageSep 7, 2026 · resolved in 1h 49m
Cloudflare Connectivity Issue Affecting Payment Processing
Affected: WorldPay Express (heritage Revention), WorldPay Integrated Payments (heritage CRS)
- Partial outageAug 20, 2026 · resolved in 7h 23m
Delivery Zone Configuration Loading Issueofficial update ↗
Affected: Google Maps
Recent Qu POS incidents
No incidents reported by Qu POS in the last 90 days.
Other restaurant POS systems to consider
- Shopify POS · #1 · 100% uptime
- SpotOn · #2 · 100% uptime
- Loyverse · #3 · 99.91% uptime
- Clover · #4 · 99.88% uptime