Restaurant POS · reliability comparison

HungerRush vs SpotOn: which is more reliable? (2026)

SpotOn is more reliable than HungerRush, scoring 99.2 vs 78.9 out of 100. Over the last 90 days HungerRush reported 3 incidents and SpotOn reported 2, with effective uptime of 99.71% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

HungerRush

78.9/100

Operational

Visit HungerRush ↗

SpotOn

99.2/100

Operational

Visit SpotOn ↗
VS
MetricHungerRushSpotOn
Reliability score78.999.2
Rank (restaurant POS systems)#7#2
Uptime (90 days)99.71%100%
Incidents (90 days)32
Partial / major outages30
Avg time to resolve3h 36m—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where HungerRush and SpotOn differ

  • HungerRush reported 50% more incidents than SpotOn over the last 90 days (3 vs 2).
  • HungerRush had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for SpotOn.
  • HungerRush's longest outage on record lasted 7h 23m (Aug 20, 2026); SpotOn's lasted 2h 51m (Nov 25, 2025).

90-day uptime

HungerRush

Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026: no incidentsAug 20, 2026: 84.61% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Aug 21, 2026 – Sep 6, 2026: no incidentsSep 7, 2026: 96.22% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Sep 8, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026: no incidentsSep 18, 2026: 93.32% uptime, 1 incident (Major outage)Sep 19, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.712% average daily uptimeToday

SpotOn

Aug 4, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent HungerRush incidents

Full HungerRush reliability report →

Recent SpotOn incidents

Full SpotOn reliability report →

Other restaurant POS systems to consider

See the full most reliable restaurant pos systems ranking →