Restaurant POS · reliability comparison
Lavu vs Qu POS: which is more reliable? (2026)
Lavu is more reliable than Qu POS, scoring 100.0 vs 52.4 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Lavu reported 0 incidents and Qu POS reported 4, with effective uptime of 100% and 98.68% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Lavu | Qu POS |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 52.4 |
| Rank (restaurant POS systems) | — | #13 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 98.68% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 4 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 1 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 18h 28m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Lavu and Qu POS differ
- Lavu reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Qu POS reported 4.
- Qu POS had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for Lavu.
90-day uptime
Lavu
Qu POS
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Lavu incidents
No incidents reported by Lavu in the last 90 days.
Recent Qu POS incidents
- Degraded performanceNov 1, 2026 · resolved in 8h 6m
Affected: POS Functionality
- Degraded performanceSep 14, 2026 · resolved in 2h 15m
EOD report not generating correctly
Affected: POS Functionality
- Degraded performanceSep 1, 2026 · resolved in 13h 59m
Affected: Enterprise Intelligence Portal
- Partial outageAug 8, 2026 · resolved in 2d 1h
Connectwise Automate Tool is Unavailableofficial update ↗
Affected: Connectwise Automate
Other restaurant POS systems to consider
- Shopify POS · #1 · 100% uptime
- SpotOn · #2 · 100% uptime
- Loyverse · #3 · 99.91% uptime
- Clover · #4 · 99.88% uptime