Transactional Email APIs · reliability comparison

Loops vs MailerSend: which is more reliable? (2026)

MailerSend is more reliable than Loops, scoring 100.0 vs 96.3 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Loops reported 1 incident and MailerSend reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.98% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we score

Loops

96.3/100

Operational

Visit Loops ↗

MailerSend

100.0/100

Operational

Visit MailerSend ↗
VS
MetricLoopsMailerSend
Reliability score96.3100.0
Rank (transactional email APIs)#3—
Uptime (90 days)99.98%100%
Incidents (90 days)10
Partial / major outages00
Avg time to resolve1h 34m—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Loops and MailerSend differ

  • MailerSend reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Loops reported 1.

90-day uptime

Loops

Aug 5, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026: no incidentsSep 11, 2026: 99.02% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 12, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.989% average daily uptimeToday

MailerSend

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Loops incidents

Full Loops reliability report →

Recent MailerSend incidents

Full MailerSend reliability report →

Other transactional email APIs to consider

See the full most reliable transactional email apis ranking →