Transactional Email APIs · reliability comparison

Loops vs Mailtrap Email Sending: which is more reliable? (2026)

Loops and Mailtrap Email Sending are effectively tied on reliability (96.3 vs 98.2). Over the last 90 days Loops reported 1 incident and Mailtrap Email Sending reported 2, with effective uptime of 99.98% and 99.99% respectively. Mailtrap Email Sending resolves incidents faster on average (6m).

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

MetricLoopsMailtrap Email Sending
Reliability score96.398.2
Rank (transactional email APIs)#3#2
Uptime (90 days)99.98%99.99%
Incidents (90 days)12
Partial / major outages00
Avg time to resolve1h 34m6m
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Loops and Mailtrap Email Sending differ

  • Mailtrap Email Sending reported 2× as many incidents as Loops over the last 90 days (2 vs 1).
  • Mailtrap Email Sending fixes problems faster: 6m on average, against 1h 34m for Loops (15.9× quicker).
  • Loops's longest outage on record lasted 46m (Mar 2, 2026); Mailtrap Email Sending's lasted 2h 57m (Nov 18, 2025).

90-day uptime

Loops

Aug 5, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026: no incidentsSep 11, 2026: 99.02% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 12, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.989% average daily uptimeToday

Mailtrap Email Sending

Aug 5, 2026 – Sep 15, 2026: no incidentsSep 16, 2026: 99.87% uptime, 2 incidents (Degraded performance)Sep 17, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.998% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Loops incidents

Full Loops reliability report →

Recent Mailtrap Email Sending incidents

Full Mailtrap Email Sending reliability report →

Other transactional email APIs to consider

See the full most reliable transactional email apis ranking →