iGaming Payment Providers · reliability comparison
MiFinity vs Payper: which is more reliable? (2026)
Payper is more reliable than MiFinity, scoring 100.0 vs 89.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days MiFinity reported 1 incident and Payper reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | MiFinity | Payper |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 89.2 | 100.0 |
| Rank (iGaming payment providers) | #5 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where MiFinity and Payper differ
- Payper reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while MiFinity reported 1.
90-day uptime
MiFinity
Payper
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent MiFinity incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 23, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent Payper incidents
No incidents reported by Payper in the last 90 days.
Other iGaming payment providers to consider
- PayRetailers · #1 · 99.99% uptime
- PaymentIQ · #2 · 99.98% uptime
- Volt · #3 · 99.96% uptime
- emerchantpay · #4 · 99.97% uptime
See the full most reliable igaming payment providers ranking →