Managed Database Services · reliability comparison
Neon vs Nhost: which is more reliable? (2026)
Nhost is more reliable than Neon, scoring 100.0 vs 87.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Neon reported 3 incidents and Nhost reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Neon | Nhost |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 87.6 | 100.0 |
| Rank (managed database services) | #4 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 3 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Neon and Nhost differ
- Nhost reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Neon reported 3.
90-day uptime
Neon
Nhost
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Neon incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- MaintenanceOct 1, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- MaintenanceSep 17, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- MaintenanceSep 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- MaintenanceSep 16, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceAug 17, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent Nhost incidents
No incidents reported by Nhost in the last 90 days.
Other managed database services to consider
- Upstash · #1 · 100% uptime
- Prisma Postgres · #2 · 99.96% uptime
- PlanetScale · #3 · 99.92% uptime
- Convex · #5 · 99.87% uptime
See the full most reliable managed database services ranking →