Managed Database Services · reliability comparison
Nhost vs Turso: which is more reliable? (2026)
Nhost is more reliable than Turso, scoring 100.0 vs 64.4 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Nhost reported 0 incidents and Turso reported 3, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.28% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Nhost | Turso |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 64.4 |
| Rank (managed database services) | — | #10 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.28% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 3 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 2 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 7h 57m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Nhost and Turso differ
- Nhost reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Turso reported 3.
- Turso had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Nhost.
- Nhost's longest incident on record lasted 2h 8m (Mar 10, 2026); Turso's lasted 15h 7m (Oct 16, 2026).
90-day uptime
Nhost
Turso
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Nhost incidents
No incidents reported by Nhost in the last 90 days.
Recent Turso incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Major outageOct 16, 2026 · resolved in 15h 7m
- Partial outageAug 4, 2026 · resolved in 48m
Other managed database services to consider
- Upstash · #1 · 100% uptime
- Prisma Postgres · #2 · 99.96% uptime
- PlanetScale · #3 · 99.92% uptime
- Neon · #4 · 100% uptime
See the full most reliable managed database services ranking →