Expense Management Software · reliability comparison
SAP Concur vs Soldo: which is more reliable? (2026)
SAP Concur is more reliable than Soldo, scoring 77.1 vs 59.7 out of 100. Over the last 90 days SAP Concur reported 1 incident and Soldo reported 1, with effective uptime of 99.74% and 99.51% respectively. SAP Concur resolves incidents faster on average (6h 46m).
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | SAP Concur | Soldo |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 77.1 | 59.7 |
| Rank (expense management tools) | #4 | #7 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.74% | 99.51% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 1 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 6h 46m | 2d 22h |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where SAP Concur and Soldo differ
- SAP Concur fixes problems faster: 6h 46m on average, against 2d 22h for Soldo (10.4× quicker).
- SAP Concur's longest incident on record lasted 6h 46m (Oct 20, 2026); Soldo's lasted 2d 22h (Oct 19, 2026).
90-day uptime
SAP Concur
Soldo
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent SAP Concur incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 6h 46m
Request degradation (Concur Cloud for Public Sector)
Affected: Request
Recent Soldo incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved in 2d 22h
Issue preventing creation of EUR bank transfers
Affected: EU Bank Transfer (SEPA)
Other expense management tools to consider
- Airbase · #1 · 100% uptime
- Rydoo · #2 · 100% uptime
- Navan · #3 · 99.97% uptime
- Emburse Professional · #5 · 99.61% uptime
See the full most reliable expense management software ranking →