Video Conferencing · reliability comparison
Webex Meetings vs Whereby: which is more reliable? (2026)
Whereby is more reliable than Webex Meetings, scoring 93.8 vs 57.1 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Webex Meetings reported 3 incidents and Whereby reported 3, with effective uptime of 99.37% and 99.95% respectively. Whereby resolves incidents faster on average (54m).
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Webex Meetings | Whereby |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 57.1 | 93.8 |
| Rank (video conferencing platforms) | #7 | #3 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.37% | 99.95% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 3 | 3 |
| Partial / major outages | 2 | 1 |
| Avg time to resolve | 1d 3h | 54m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Webex Meetings and Whereby differ
- Webex Meetings had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 1 for Whereby.
- Whereby fixes problems faster: 54m on average, against 1d 3h for Webex Meetings (30.1× quicker).
- Webex Meetings's longest outage on record lasted 1d 3h (Oct 28, 2026); Whereby's lasted 55m (Apr 29, 2026).
90-day uptime
Webex Meetings
Whereby
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Webex Meetings incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 30, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Partial outageOct 28, 2026 · resolved in 1d 3h
Gateway and Solutions: Some users may be unable to join meetings from video devices via Video Integration for Microsoft Teams (VIMT)official update ↗
- Partial outageOct 28, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent Whereby incidents
- Degraded performanceSep 22, 2026 · resolved in 2h 2m
Customer insights (dashboard and api) - degraded performance
- Degraded performanceSep 14, 2026 · resolved in 4m
- Major outageSep 1, 2026 · resolved in 36m
Other video conferencing platforms to consider
- Google Meet · #1 · 100% uptime
- Livestorm · #2 · 99.99% uptime
- GoTo Meeting · #4 · 99.94% uptime
- RingCentral Video · #5 · 100% uptime
See the full most reliable video conferencing platforms ranking →