Monitoring & Observability · reliability comparison

Honeycomb vs PagerDuty: which is more reliable? (2026)

PagerDuty is more reliable than Honeycomb, scoring 90.0 vs 85.4 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Honeycomb reported 5 incidents and PagerDuty reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.86% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

MetricHoneycombPagerDuty
Reliability score85.490.0
Rank (monitoring & observability tools)#6—
Uptime (90 days)99.86%100%
Incidents (90 days)50
Partial / major outages30
Avg time to resolve2h 19m—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/10050/100

Where Honeycomb and PagerDuty differ

  • PagerDuty reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Honeycomb reported 5.
  • Honeycomb had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for PagerDuty.

90-day uptime

Honeycomb

Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 9, 2026: no incidentsAug 10, 2026: 95.27% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 20, 2026: no incidentsAug 21, 2026: 99.60% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Aug 22, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026: no incidentsOct 20, 2026: 95.09% uptime, 2 incidents (Partial outage)Oct 21, 2026: no incidentsOct 22, 2026: 97.88% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Oct 23, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.865% average daily uptimeToday

PagerDuty

Aug 4, 2026 – Oct 31, 2026: no dataNov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Honeycomb incidents

Full Honeycomb reliability report →

Recent PagerDuty incidents

No incidents reported by PagerDuty in the last 90 days.

Full PagerDuty reliability report →

Other monitoring & observability tools to consider

See the full most reliable monitoring & observability tools ranking →